Notice: Use of undefined constant a_id - assumed 'a_id' in /home/painphys/public_html/linkout_vw.php on line 21

Notice: Use of undefined constant article_code - assumed 'article_code' in /home/painphys/public_html/linkout_vw.php on line 21

Notice: Use of undefined constant journal_code - assumed 'journal_code' in /home/painphys/public_html/linkout_vw.php on line 22

Notice: Use of undefined constant journal_code - assumed 'journal_code' in /home/painphys/public_html/linkout_vw.php on line 22

Notice: Use of undefined constant pages - assumed 'pages' in /home/painphys/public_html/linkout_vw.php on line 23

Notice: Use of undefined constant article_pdf_format - assumed 'article_pdf_format' in /home/painphys/public_html/linkout_vw.php on line 23

Notice: Use of undefined constant a_id - assumed 'a_id' in /home/painphys/public_html/linkout_vw.php on line 21

Notice: Use of undefined constant article_code - assumed 'article_code' in /home/painphys/public_html/linkout_vw.php on line 21

Notice: Use of undefined constant journal_code - assumed 'journal_code' in /home/painphys/public_html/linkout_vw.php on line 22

Notice: Use of undefined constant journal_code - assumed 'journal_code' in /home/painphys/public_html/linkout_vw.php on line 22

Notice: Use of undefined constant pages - assumed 'pages' in /home/painphys/public_html/linkout_vw.php on line 23

Notice: Use of undefined constant article_pdf_format - assumed 'article_pdf_format' in /home/painphys/public_html/linkout_vw.php on line 23

Notice: Use of undefined constant pages - assumed 'pages' in /home/painphys/public_html/linkout_vw.php on line 31

Notice: Use of undefined constant a_id - assumed 'a_id' in /home/painphys/public_html/linkout_vw.php on line 35

Notice: Use of undefined constant journal_code - assumed 'journal_code' in /home/painphys/public_html/linkout_vw.php on line 36
:::::Pain Physician:::::
 
Past Issue - December 2011 - Vol 14 Issue 6 Index | Previous | Next | 
2011;14;499-511. Interlaminar Versus Transforaminal Epidural Steroids for the Treatment of Subacute Lumbar Radicular Pain: A Randomized, Blinded, Prospective Outcome Study
Randomized Trial
Christopher G. Gharibo, MD, Gerald P. Varlotta, DO, Ellen E. Rhame, MD, En-Chia James Liu, MD, John A Bendo, MD, and Michael D. Perloff, MD, PhD
 

BACKGROUND: There is uncertainty in the literature over the relative effectiveness of lumbar epidural interlaminar (IL) steroid injection versus transforaminal (TF) steroid injection for lumbar radiculopathy. Most studies to date have been retrospective, or technically focused.

OBJECTIVE: To complete a randomized, blinded, prospective outcome study of the short-term benefit for IL versus TF epidural steroids for the treatment of subacute lumbar radicular pain.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, blinded, subacute efficacy trial.

SETTING: Tertiary care pain management center, major metropolitan city, United States

METHODS: After institutional review board approval, 42 age-matched patients with similar lower back pain and unilateral radicular symptoms were enrolled and randomized in a patient and evaluating physician blinded trial to IL or TF epidural steroids from 2007 through 2009. Prior to intervention and 10-16 days after injection, each participant was evaluated by questionnaire and physical exam by an independent physician. All injections were performed by the same physician. Thirty-eight participants completed the study, 18 in the IL group and 20 in the TF group. Four participants required a repeat injection, and 2 participants crossed over to the alternative injection type (IL to TF).

RESULTS: Overall, physical exam, diagnostic testing, disability, activity, depression measures, and opioid pill use were similar between the 2 groups, both pre-injection baseline and post-injection improvement. In primary outcomes, the post-injection follow-up Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) was more greatly reduced in the TF group. The NRS decreased from 7.0 1.9 to 3.9 3.1 (mean values +/- standard deviation) in the IL group and 6.4 2.1 to 1.7 1.4 in the TF group. The Oswestry Disability Index was reduced from 37.5 12.6 to 19.0 16.7 in the IL group and 38.3 6.4 to 21.6 16.8 in the TF group. In secondary outcomes, the depression scale was reduced from 4.39 3.22 to 2.28 3.20 in the IL group and 4.10 1.94 to 1.65 1.63 in the TF group. Walking tolerance was increased from 8.1 4.6 blocks to 10.6 4.4 in the IL group and 8.9 5.3 blocks to 11.8 4.2 in the TF group.

LIMITATIONS: The study did not examine long-term outcomes. A single experienced interventionalist performed all injections.

CONCLUSION: Results suggest that patients may experience greater subjective relief, at least initially, from TF epidural steroid injections over IL. However, more objective, and likely subacute, therapeutic effects are similar.

 

 

   
 
Author Information
>> Manuscript Guidelines
Advertising
>> Rates
>> Ad format requirements

Quick Search in
PubMed
CrossRef
Pain Physcian
Authors
Michael D. Perloff
Gerald P. Varlotta
Ellen E. Rhame
En-Chia James Liu
John A Bendo
Christopher G. Gharibo


Keywords
epidural
steroids
interlaminar
transforaminal
lumbar
lumbosacral
radicular
low back pain